A Cost Analysis of Wimpy Squares            
                             
I've been running the Wimpy Squares pool for 17 years now (2024 is the 17th year) and I've been pleased with its popularity.   
Although I'd "borrowed" the idea from someone else, (he charged $50 for every square) I thought I could improve on it by charging
less for the (perceived) less popular squares, while charging a premium for combinations most people wanted. This seemed to   
work pretty well, however it was still difficult to move the cheaper squares, even with the discount. In 2013, I decided to do a cost
analysis of the whole pool, based on 7, (now 17) years of data. Which squares were really better and which ones were poor
investments?  I've limited my focus to final point spreads. That is to say that a final score of 54-50 is no more or less likely    
than a final score of 55-51.  All of the 4-point spreads are lumped together and priced the same. While the data exists on the site
for individual combinations if you want to look that deeply, I feel this differential analysis provides some fascinating information
for anyone looking to handicap future contests.                    
                             
Point Differential 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1        
                             
2007 500 1200 550 350 325 225 275 600 250 625 4900      
2008 525 425 650 1225 100 825 275 150 300 425 4900      
2009 175 500 125 1275 75 400 550 400 725 675 4900      
2010 75 200 225 800 50 275 150 625 1650 850 4900      
2011 275 175 675 500 100 150 225 600 1575 625 4900      
2012 125 125 1425 375 275 325 725 700 700 125 4900      
2013 475 25 175 150 1475 425 700 250 700 525 4900      
2014 725 150 175 350 1300 350 450 275 500 625 4900      
2015 800 350 175 725 400 1075 300 375 350 350 4900      
2016 75 175 200 500 400 800 850 1500 275 125 4900      
2017 300 175 100 275 1225 125 775 550 675 700 4900      
2018 125 325 50 1200 625 325 700 450 725 375 4900      
2019 425 325 1100 325 500 500 450 400 325 550 4900      
2021 550 775 300 150 1375 125 325 725 350 225 4900      
2022 325 275 275 350 850 775 575 1150 225 100 4900      
2023 75 125 350 1475 125 350 150 875 575 800 4900      
2024 200 200 250 425 600 1375 550 625 450 225 4900      
17 YEAR VALUE $338.24 $325.00 $400.00 $614.71 $576.47 $495.59 $472.06 $602.94 $608.82 $466.18 4900      
16 YEAR VALUE $346.88 $332.81 $409.38 $626.56 $575.00 $440.63 $467.19 $601.56 $618.75 $481.25 4900      
Adj. 17 YR VALUE $338.24 $266.18 $282.35 $379.41 $341.18 $377.94 $472.06 $485.29 $491.18 $466.18 3900      
                             
Let's look at the results.  The gray shaded cells show which differential won the grand prize $1000 for that year.        
An award that large will naturally skew the results in favor of that spread. This is similar to the way that a slot      
machine may pay back 95% of of the money taken in, but if you don't hit the big jackpot, you are going to receive      
a substantially smaller percentage.      
                             
After 17 years, you can see that winning the grand prize raises the expected value of each differential by $5.88      
The blue cells show the expected return of that number without the grand prize factored in          
To put this number in perspective, you should assume each square costs $10 less.            
                             
We cannot ignore the impact of winning the grand prize. After 17 years, it is clear that the most likely spread to win the Grand Prize 
has been the 6 and 7 point spreads. If there was only ONE prize being paid out for the final game, those 6 and 7 point spreads  
would necessarily cost at least twice as much as any other combination. If you like winning smaller amounts more frequently,   
the 1, 2, 3, and 4 point spreads pay out more. (Look at the Adj 17 yr Value line) If instead, you are interested in winning     
the most money, the 6 and 7 point spreads seem to offer the best shot.               
2013 Cost Was 40 44 44 50 50 52 52 56 56 56 500      
2014 Cost Was 30 34 47 55 45 52 52 60 65 60 500      
2015 Cost Was 35 34 47 52 50 52 52 53 65 60 500      
2016 Cost Was 38 35 45 54 50 53 50 53 65 57 500      
2017 Cost Was 36 34 45 55 50 54 52 55 64 55 500      
2018 Cost Was 36 32 43 54 52 51 54 55 65 58 500      
2019 Cost Was 35 32 40 55 53 50 56 56 65 58 500      
2021 Cost Was 35 32 43 55 55 50 55 55 64 56 500      
2022 Cost Was 36 34 43 54 57 48 54 55 64 55 500      
2023 Cost Was 37 34 44 56 60 48 50 57 62 52 500      
2024 Cost Was 35 33 44 59 58 48 50 58 62 53 500      
2025 New Cost Is 33 31 42 61 61 52 50 57 62 51 500      
                             
                             
Point Differential 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1        
2024 Cost/Square 35 33 44 59 58 48 50 58 62 53 500      
16 YEAR VALUE $34.69 $33.28 $40.94 $62.66 $57.50 $44.06 $46.71 $60.16 $61.88 $48.13 4,900      
17 YEAR VALUE $33.82 $32.50 $40.00 $61.47 $57.65 $49.56 $47.21 $60.29 $60.88 $46.62 490      
Profit/Loss per yr -$0.87 -$0.78 -$0.94 -$1.19 $0.15 $5.50 $0.50 $0.13 -$1.00 -$1.51 490      
                             
The squares are not randomly priced. They are priced based on a 17 year performance, with differentials that have won the grand
prize usually being sold at a premium.                       
From year to year, the price of any given differential may go up or down slightly, depending on how well/poorly those combinations 
have done in recent years.                          
                             
                           
What happened in 2024...                        
                           
I believe after 17 years, we can begin to stabilize some of these prices based on what we've seen in the past.      
The lower differentials win more often, but the middle differentials win the big money more often.          
The 9 and 10 point squares can win, but are a far bigger longshot than lower differentials. I've reduced the costs of those squares 
about as low as they can go. I've moved the price of the 6 and 7 point squares up - to reflect how often they've won the Jackpot Prize.
The two point differentials remain the highest cost, but just barely. The three point diffentials are have come down slightly,   
but still represent a good chance to win several games in lower rounds. Unless upcoming results skew payouts far from these predictions,
these are the prices I'm expecting to lock in for the forseeable future.                
                             
Return to Main Menu