**A Wimpy Squares Cost Analysis**

I've been running the Wimpy Squares pool for 15 years now (2023 is the 15th year) and I've been pleased with its popularity. | ||||||||||||||

Although I'd "borrowed" the idea from someone else, (he charged $50 for every square) I thought I could improve on it by charging | ||||||||||||||

less for the (perceived) less popular squares, while charging a premium for combinations most people wanted. This seemed to | ||||||||||||||

work pretty well, however it was still difficult to move the cheaper squares, even with the discount. In 2013, I decided to do a cost | ||||||||||||||

analysis of the whole pool, based on 7, (now 15) years of data. Which squares were really better and which ones were poor investments? | ||||||||||||||

I've limited my focus to final point spreads. That is to say that a final score of 54-50 is no more nor less likely than a final score of 55-51. | ||||||||||||||

All of the 4-point spreads are lumped together. While the data exists on the site for individual combinations if you want to look that deeply, I feel this differential analysis provides some fascinating information for anyone looking to handicap future contests. | ||||||||||||||

Point Differential | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||||

2007 | 500 | 1200 | 550 | 350 | 325 | 225 | 275 | 600 | 250 | 625 | 4900 | |||

2008 | 525 | 425 | 650 | 1225 | 100 | 825 | 275 | 150 | 300 | 425 | 4900 | |||

2009 | 175 | 500 | 125 | 1275 | 75 | 400 | 550 | 400 | 725 | 675 | 4900 | |||

2010 | 75 | 200 | 225 | 800 | 50 | 275 | 150 | 625 | 1650 | 850 | 4900 | |||

2011 | 275 | 175 | 675 | 500 | 100 | 150 | 225 | 600 | 1575 | 625 | 4900 | |||

2012 | 125 | 125 | 1425 | 375 | 275 | 325 | 725 | 700 | 700 | 125 | 4900 | |||

2013 | 475 | 25 | 175 | 150 | 1475 | 425 | 700 | 250 | 700 | 525 | 4900 | |||

2014 | 725 | 150 | 175 | 350 | 1300 | 350 | 450 | 275 | 500 | 625 | 4900 | |||

2015 | 800 | 350 | 175 | 725 | 400 | 1075 | 300 | 375 | 350 | 350 | 4900 | |||

2016 | 75 | 175 | 200 | 500 | 400 | 800 | 850 | 1500 | 275 | 125 | 4900 | |||

2017 | 300 | 175 | 100 | 275 | 1225 | 125 | 775 | 550 | 675 | 700 | 4900 | |||

2018 | 125 | 325 | 50 | 1200 | 625 | 325 | 700 | 450 | 725 | 375 | 4900 | |||

2019 | 425 | 325 | 1100 | 325 | 500 | 500 | 450 | 400 | 325 | 550 | 4900 | |||

2021 | 550 | 775 | 300 | 150 | 1375 | 125 | 325 | 725 | 350 | 225 | 4900 | |||

2022 | 325 | 275 | 275 | 350 | 850 | 775 | 575 | 1150 | 225 | 100 | 4900 | |||

15 YEAR VALUE | $365.00 | $346.67 | $413.33 | $570.00 | $605.00 | $446.67 | $488.33 | $583.33 | $621.67 | $460.00 | 4900 | |||

Adj. 15 yr value | $365.00 | $280.00 | $280.00 | $370.00 | $338.33 | $380.00 | $488.33 | $450.00 | $488.33 | $460.00 | 3900 | |||

2013 Cost Was | 40 | 44 | 44 | 50 | 50 | 52 | 52 | 56 | 56 | 56 | 500 | |||

2014 Cost Was | 30 | 34 | 47 | 55 | 45 | 52 | 52 | 60 | 65 | 60 | 500 | |||

2015 Cost Was | 35 | 34 | 47 | 52 | 50 | 52 | 52 | 53 | 65 | 60 | 500 | |||

2016 Cost Was | 38 | 35 | 45 | 54 | 50 | 53 | 50 | 53 | 65 | 57 | 500 | |||

2017 Cost Was | 36 | 34 | 45 | 55 | 50 | 54 | 52 | 55 | 64 | 55 | 500 | |||

2018 Cost Was | 36 | 32 | 43 | 54 | 52 | 51 | 54 | 55 | 65 | 58 | 500 | |||

2019 Cost Was | 35 | 32 | 40 | 55 | 53 | 50 | 56 | 56 | 65 | 58 | 500 | |||

2021 Cost Was | 35 | 32 | 43 | 55 | 55 | 50 | 55 | 55 | 64 | 56 | 500 | |||

2022 Cost Was | 36 | 34 | 43 | 54 | 57 | 48 | 54 | 55 | 64 | 55 | 500 | |||

2023 NEW Cost Is | 37 | 34 | 44 | 56 | 60 | 48 | 50 | 57 | 62 | 52 | 500 | |||

Let's look at the results. The gray shaded cells show which differential won the grand prize $1000 for that year. To put this number in perspective, you should assume that the squares each cost $10 less. An award that large will naturally skew the results in favor of that | ||||||||||||||

spread. This is similar to the way that a slot machine may pay back 95% of the money taken in, but if you don't hit the big jackpot, | ||||||||||||||

you're going to receive a substantially smaller percentage. After 15 years, you can see that winning the grand prize raises the expected | ||||||||||||||

value of each differential by $6.67. The blue cells show the expected return of that number without the grand prize factored in. | ||||||||||||||

To put this number in perspective, you should assume each square costs $10 less. | ||||||||||||||

Point Differential | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||||

Cost/Square | $37.00 | $34.00 | $44.00 | $56.00 | $60.00 | $48.00 | $50.00 | $57.00 | $62.00 | $52.00 | $500.00 | |||

15 YEAR VALUE | $36.50 | $34.67 | $41.33 | $57.00 | $60.50 | $44.67 | $48.83 | $58.33 | $62.17 | $46.00 | 490 | |||

Profit/Loss per yr | -$0.50 | $0.67 | -$2.67 | $1.00 | $0.50 | -$3.33 | -$1.17 | $1.33 | $0.17 | -$6.00 | -$10.00 | |||

The squares are not randomly priced. They are priced based on a 15 year performance, with differentials that have won the grand prize often being sold at a premium. | ||||||||||||||

From year to year, the price of any given differential may go up or down slightly, depending on how well/poorly those combinations have done in recent years. |

__What happened in 2014...__

2014 saw some corrections in the data that were probably due.
The underperforming 10 point squares hit it big for $72.50/square, which was a
huge windfall for a few players with 2-2 ($250) and 3-3 ($375). The 10
point squares also have a strong chance to hit the halftime score of the
Championship Game for $300. Recognizing that with approximately double the
chance to win the $300 halftime final than a 9-pt square, the price of 10 point squares has gone up $5/square. Despite hitting only one other game for $50, (1-5), a 6-point
differential (0-4) hit the jackpot for the 2nd year in a row. Two jackpots in 2
years cannot be ignored, and I've increased the cost of 6-point squares by $5. There are
corresponding cost * reductions* on the 7 and 3 point differentials.
7 point squares have been reduced $3 and 3 point squares have been reduced a
whopping $7/square!

The 10 point squares hit it big again, with 1-1 winning a Final Four game for $300, and then again, hitting the halftime of the Championship Final for another $300. As a group, each $35 10-point square won an average of $80 each. This reinforces my observation last year that the added chance of hitting a halftime score in the Final Game makes 10-pt differential square a better investment than a 9-pt differential square. I've raised the price of 10-pt squares $3. After a strong year, I've also raised the prices of of the 5, 7, and 9 point spreads. After a disappointing year, I've lowered the prices of the 1, 4, and 8 point spreads.

Historically, the higher pricing will do little to deter people from selecting the 1 and 2 point spreads. My goal is to make the other combinations attractive by competitive pricing. I am expecting continued higher interest in the 9 and 10 point squares. I also expect that despite underperforming for 3 straight years, the 3 point squares at $53 will remain popular.

The 10 point squares bottomed out, winning only 3 $25 games. They still offer strong chances to win the halftime of the final game, thus cost a bit more than the 9 point squares. I've lowered the price of 10-pt squares $2, and the 9-pt squares $1. After a strong year, I've also raised the prices of of the 3, 4, and 5 point spreads. I've raised the price of the 7-pt squares after a moderate return in 2016 to reflect their strong performance over the last 10 years. Finally, I've slightly lowered the prices of the 1 and 2 pt squares, after both underperformed 2 years in a row.

The 1 and 2 point combinations continued to be consistent winners. The 5, 8, and 9 point squares had terrible returns, and the 7's weren't much better. The 7-point squares still have a relatively high cost because they remain one of the three columns to have won the Championship game more than once over the last decade. I reduced the price on all of them. The 6-point squares hit the jackpot for the third time in 2017. They haven't earned much when they don't hit that final game, a small increase in price seemed appropriate. The 4-point squares came in strong for the second year in a row. I raised the price on the 4 most profitable columns from 2017. At $36 and $32 respectively, the 10 and 9 point squares offer tremendous value if they should happen to hit even once for $25.

The 10 point squares had a rough year, hitting only 4 times, and for very small amounts. The 9 point squares hit only twice, but one of them was a $300 halftime final which brought up the average. They are still by far the cheapest square on the board, and the 10 point squares have been dropped another dollar. The worst performers by a wide margin were the 8 point squares which only hit twice for the bare minimum. These may be a bargain however at their new $40 price tag. 6 and 7 point squares continue to hit sporadically but often for big payouts. I've raised the price of each a dollar. After disappointing back-to-back seasons, I've lowered the 5 point squares $1. The 4 point squares have been huge winners for the last 3 years, and the $2 raise reflects it. I raised the price of the 3 point squares $1, because they have historically outperformed the 4 point squares, and I didn't think that they should be cheaper.

__What happened in 2019...__

The 10 point squares had another terrific year, outperforming several more expensive combinations. The 2, 7, and 9 point squares all had a down year. The 8 point squares hit the jackpot, and I've boosted their price by $3. I also raised the price of the 6-pt squares by $2 to basically bring them into line with the 3, 4, and 7 point differentials. I lowered the cost of the 1-pt differentials by $2, but they are still the 2nd highest priced square on the board. I also lowered the expensive 2, 3, and 4 point squares by $1 each.

Pretty much everything you need to know is posted here, or elsewhere on the site. Perhaps you can spot a bargain amongst the clusters of data. Did I raise some combinations too much? If so, then there is value somewhere else. Find the diamond in the rough, and you can cash in.

__What happened in 2021...__

There was no tournament in 2020. The 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 point squares underperformed terribly. A large number of games were not close, and the cheaper squares often proved to be bargains. Despite two straight years of poor results for the two point spreads, the demand for them remains high and I've elected to keep their price on the top of the board at $64. The one and four point spreads took a beating, and I've reduced their costs by $1. I've similarly reduced the prices for 5 and 7 point spreads, both of which had an abysmal year. The 6-point squares won the jackpot for the 4th time in 14 years, and have been appropriately bumped $2. I've also raised the prices of the 9 and 10 point squares, which is probably overdue.

__What happened in 2022...__

Once again, the 1, and 2 point squares had a historically poor year, each winning less in 2022 than has ever happened in 15 years. The 3-point squares didn't fare much better except that they hit the jackpot prize in the final game. The 4, 5, and 6 point spreads had banner years, and experienced healthy profits not winning the big money. The 6-point squares did better than any of them, winning on average 57% over cost. Factoring in that the 6 point spreads have won the big money more often than any other spread, their cost has increased the most, from $57 to $60 per square. The 3-pt and 7-pt spreads have been raised $2 to bring them more in line with their profitability over the last several years. In 2015, the 1-pt spreads were selling for a high of $60/square. After 7 seasons of mostly lackluster returns, I have dropped them to $52/square. The 2-pt spreads have been dropped from $64/square to $62. The 8-pt and 10-pt squares have both gone up $1, while the 4-pt differentials (having never won the big money) have dropped a massive $4/square becoming possibly the best bargain on the board at $50/square.